<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejection Letter Stories #4: Editors make mistakes too&#8230;(of course!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theliterarytype.ca/index.php/?feed=rss2&#038;p=783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783</link>
	<description>The Literary Type</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:08:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: small press fair reading 27th &#8211; Pesbo</title>
		<link>http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783&#038;cpage=1#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>small press fair reading 27th &#8211; Pesbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783#comment-398</guid>
		<description>[...] Gordon who writes and publishes in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gordon who writes and publishes in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783&#038;cpage=1#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Yes! I love this post! I&#039;ve had this conversation so, so many times with writers who also submit short stories to (mostly Canadian) journals. I think it&#039;s important also to point out the financial/business side of this: a journal will publish a writer who will give them &quot;name recognition&quot; (a term I acquired while working at a book festival, haha) in hopes of greater sales and/or recognition. I&#039;ve had several stories published after rejections, revisions, etc, and I don&#039;t want to throw down a macho platitude like &quot;roll with the punches,&quot; but it can be worthwhile to embrace the arbitrary nature of things. Then again, I do understand why people write those &quot;moron&quot; letters -- anything done in isolation for a long enough period will drive anyone crazy; I&#039;ve spoken to a lot of people who *hate* journals and *hate* the selection process and now think it&#039;s just an expression of frustration, disillusionment and the self-isolation that writing can easily bring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I love this post! I&#8217;ve had this conversation so, so many times with writers who also submit short stories to (mostly Canadian) journals. I think it&#8217;s important also to point out the financial/business side of this: a journal will publish a writer who will give them &#8220;name recognition&#8221; (a term I acquired while working at a book festival, haha) in hopes of greater sales and/or recognition. I&#8217;ve had several stories published after rejections, revisions, etc, and I don&#8217;t want to throw down a macho platitude like &#8220;roll with the punches,&#8221; but it can be worthwhile to embrace the arbitrary nature of things. Then again, I do understand why people write those &#8220;moron&#8221; letters &#8212; anything done in isolation for a long enough period will drive anyone crazy; I&#8217;ve spoken to a lot of people who *hate* journals and *hate* the selection process and now think it&#8217;s just an expression of frustration, disillusionment and the self-isolation that writing can easily bring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Clare</title>
		<link>http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783&#038;cpage=1#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783#comment-324</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of TNQ being a &quot;rag&quot;. Can you imagine how wonderful magazines in general would have to be for this to be the case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of TNQ being a &#8220;rag&#8221;. Can you imagine how wonderful magazines in general would have to be for this to be the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783&#038;cpage=1#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 05:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783#comment-322</guid>
		<description>The fact is, a lot of great work gets turned down, because there&#039;s only so much we can accept. 
I have to wonder about the people who write those &quot;morons&quot; letters.  We had one of those, in which the fellow referred to TNQ as a &quot;rag.&quot;   So why did he bother sending a submission?  It shouldn&#039;t need saying, but writing insulting letters should be #1 on the &quot;things not to do while trying to get published&quot; list.  Sometimes when our editors (at least on the poetry side) don&#039;t feel that something is a good fit for TNQ, they can suggest a mag that they think will be a better fit.   Writing childish, unprofessional letters every time you get a rejection isn&#039;t going to do anything but get you blacklisted all over the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, a lot of great work gets turned down, because there&#8217;s only so much we can accept.<br />
I have to wonder about the people who write those &#8220;morons&#8221; letters.  We had one of those, in which the fellow referred to TNQ as a &#8220;rag.&#8221;   So why did he bother sending a submission?  It shouldn&#8217;t need saying, but writing insulting letters should be #1 on the &#8220;things not to do while trying to get published&#8221; list.  Sometimes when our editors (at least on the poetry side) don&#8217;t feel that something is a good fit for TNQ, they can suggest a mag that they think will be a better fit.   Writing childish, unprofessional letters every time you get a rejection isn&#8217;t going to do anything but get you blacklisted all over the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783&#038;cpage=1#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theliterarytype.ca/?p=783#comment-321</guid>
		<description>I quite agree. We do the best we can in this job, and we select the stories we believe will appeal to our readers, regardless of the author&#039;s credentials. Rejection letters are difficult to write because we don&#039;t just use a form letter. Some authors take rejection personally (one wrote back and called us a bunch of &quot;morons&quot;) while others thank us for our honest appraisal of their work. Some sell the same  story to another magazine.  We do the best we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree. We do the best we can in this job, and we select the stories we believe will appeal to our readers, regardless of the author&#8217;s credentials. Rejection letters are difficult to write because we don&#8217;t just use a form letter. Some authors take rejection personally (one wrote back and called us a bunch of &#8220;morons&#8221;) while others thank us for our honest appraisal of their work. Some sell the same  story to another magazine.  We do the best we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
