Why I Didn’t Read Harry Potter

Some time ago, I made my friend Catherine a deal here on the blog: I’d read one of the ‘young adult’ books she loves if she’d read one of my favourite ‘adult’ books. For her, I chose The Life of Pi; for me, she chose Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. I’ve since held up my end of the bargain.

Well. What a ripping good yarn. Why did I avoid this book for so long? I had my reasons.  Stupid, stupid reasons. Here they are, for you to quite rightly mock: Read more »

Does your short story collection need an e-publisher?

If you’ve got $10, an email address, and 130-250 pages of solid short fiction, you can enter Joyland.ca’s Short Story Collection Search:

This fall Joyland and ECW Press are launching the Joyland eBook imprint to spotlight the best in short fiction across North America.  Our first two collections are from New York’s Jim Hanas and Toronto’s Chris Eaton. For our spring 2011 title, we’re soliciting a short story collection from one of our Joyland readers. The selected book will be e-published in Spring 2011, with a $500 advance and will be available through Amazon, Kobo and other venues.

Deadline for submission is August 1, 2010.

Click here for the rules and regs.  Good luck, y’all!!

Love for the Lists Issue

Sima Rabinowitz over at newpages.com posted a review of our Lists Issue — and of course, her review is in the form of a list!

Why I adored this issue of The New Quarterly:

1. It’s composed entirely of list poems (“To List is Human” is the theme).

2. Guest editor Diane Schoemperlen’s cover art (a glorious collage) and her prose and collage/images of images, “222 Brief Notes on the Study of Nature, Human and Otherwise,” are exemplary specimens of a list’s power in the service of art-making . . .

[Read full review here]

Are you a book-loving 20-29 yr old?

Do you have time to answer 10 questions about your book-buying habits/lack thereof?  Julianna, a stellar former TNQ volunteer is currently enrolled in Humber’s Creative Book Publishing program, is conducting this survey as part of her studies. I, alas, turned 30 this year and am thus unable to participate, but I strongly encourage any of you young folks reading this to help our girl out! The survey will be up until July 20.

And here’s something bookish for readers of any age, courtesy of TNQ’s most stylish member, Amanda Watkins (one of our Fiction Editors, who also moonlights as the Secretary of TNQ’s governing board.) I mean, handbags made of books! Two of my favorite things, combined into one supremely fabulous item. What’s next? A bracelet made of bacon? A cottage made of cupcakes? Sadly, it seems these Olympia Le-Tan purses are not available for sale online, just in stores and there’s only one in Canada — The Bay in Toronto. Yet another reason for me to visit the big smoke.

TNQ Office Pet Peeves

Ah, the joys of sharing a workspace. TNQ’s current workspace is bigger and lovelier than our old digs, which means that more people can occupy it at the same time. Though I sometimes relish the times when I’ve got the whole place to myself, on balance, I love the new, busier dynamic of TNQ’s new HQ.  Further, I’m fascinated by the ways in which people work and occupy space differently.  It’s a creative, not-for-profit work environment — ie, lots more work than time or money to do it with/for, in an atmosphere of  general goodwill — so I wonder if we are more tolerant of each others’ working habits than say, the corporate giants.  But even so, I’ve noticed that each TNQ staffer has her own unique peeves:

Kim’s: lunch dishes left out on the table (rather than returned to the caf or the staffer’s own desk after lunch)

Melissa’s: I’m guessing here, but I’m going to go with dead plants due to, er, inconsistent watering by her colleagues on the days she is not in (she’s only in two days a week). I also know for a certainty that she hates the Staples-brand post-its I bought last time because they are accordion-style – ie, placement of the adhesive varies top to bottom with each one, so sometimes she tears one off to discover that she’s written on it in the “wrong” orientation….

Catherine’s:  Probably the rampant “pen thievery” from her desk — there are never good pens on her desk because it’s nearest the phone and some people (ahem) take a message and then keep the pen they used to write it with.  Also, as Catherine is our currently our chief processor of submissions, I happen to know it makes her semi-certifiable when our guidelines are not respected.

Mine: I’ve got a few, but only two of any significance: the first is when shared office supplies are not returned to their ‘proper’ places and the second is its kissing cousin, when someone opens a cabinet and says “where is the…” without really looking.  I know where the thing they want is supposed to be without having to look up from my desk because I put some thought (and, um, some labels) into the initial organization of this joint when we moved in.  If the thing is where I say it is, I’m annoyed because I know they didn’t really look. My system is lovely: its only flaw is that in order to make use of it, one’s eyes must be open. If the thing’s not in its place, well …. it just should be, which takes us back to my first peeve, eh?

My parents are to blame for this one—indeed, my mom would probably be proud of how much this bugs me.  “Put it back where it came from when you’re done” was the house rule for all objects held in common (dishes, ketchup, toothpaste, etc) and for one’s own things stored in common areas (like, say, bicycles in the garage).  How each family member kept his or her own room was that person’s own business — it could look like a landfill, so long as it was more or less inhabitable from a health point of view (mess is fine; mold is not).  All this time, I’ve been assuming the same policy applies pretty much everywhere — and yes, I’m just realizing this is a little weird.  Also weird? How much joy I get out of putting things back in their places, even if I do initially start in on the task feeling rather pissed off that nothing is in the (neatly labeled! super logical!) location I chose for it.  Yeah. Everything you’re thinking about me right now is probably true.

Those of you literary types out there sharing workspaces … what are your office peeves?

This Just In …

Courtesy of my friend Kate. (Er, and The Onion, masters of it’s-funny-because-it-hurts):

Unconventional Director Sets Shakespeare Play In Time, Place Shakespeare Intended

MORRISTOWN, NJ—In an innovative, tradition-defying rethinking of one of the greatest comedies in the English language, Morristown Community Players director Kevin Hiles announced Monday his bold intention to set his theater’s production of William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice in 16th-century Venice.

“I know when most people hear The Merchant Of Venice, they think 1960s Las Vegas, a high-powered Manhattan stock brokerage, or an 18th-century Georgia slave plantation, but I think it’s high time to shake things up a bit,” Hiles said. “The great thing about Shakespeare is that the themes in his plays are so universal that they can be adapted to just about any time and place.”

According to Hiles, everything in the production will be adapted to the unconventional setting. Swords will replace guns, ducats will be used instead of the American dollar or Japanese yen, and costumes, such as Shylock’s customary pinstripe suit, general’s uniform, or nudity, will be replaced by garb of the kind worn by Jewish moneylenders of the Italian Renaissance.

“Audiences may be taken aback initially by the lack of Creole accents,” Hiles said. “But I think if they pay close enough attention, they’ll recognize that all the metaphors, similes, and puns remain firmly intact, maybe even more so, in the Elizabethan dialect.”

Added Hiles: “After all, a pound of flesh is a pound of flesh, whether you’re trying to woo a lady in 16th-century Europe, or you’re a high school senior trying to impress your girlfriend with a limo ride to the prom, like in the last Merchant production MCP did in ’95.”

Read the rest here. You’ll be glad you did.